COVID infection is classified as an occupational disease

Among other provisions, the new standard recognizes COVID-19 as an occupational disease for all health and social health personnel. According to the Independent Trade Union Center and Civil Servants (CSIF), Spain continues to be the first country in the world with the most infections among Health personnel. Specifically, in the last week another 5,997 workers have been infected throughout the country and the number of infections in this group exceeds 118,000 since the start of the pandemic. Council of Ministers held in June 2020 (SOURCE: Moncloa) Exceptional response Already in its explanatory memorandum (section III), it is anticipated that “the benefits that these professionals may accrue will be the same as those that the Social Security system grants to those who have contracted an occupational disease.” With this agreement, progress is made in the protection of professionals “who provide services in health or socio-health centers and who contract COVID-19 in the exercise of their profession during the pandemic situation, extending this coverage to health personnel who provide services in the medical inspection of the Public Health Services and the .

Thus, giving an “ exceptional response to an exceptional situation”, the present recognition “satisfies the demands that had been formulated in this regard from different corporations and associations of health and socio-health WhatsApp Number List professionals, also responding to the demand made to the Government.” by the parliamentary groups.” Article 6 To explore the new WhatsApp Number List normative recognition we have to turn to art. 6 of the RDL: In the first section, it is announced that all health and social health personnel who, in the exercise of their profession , that is, during the provision of health or social health services, contract the COVID-19 virus, within the period from the declaration of the international pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) until the lifting of all prevention measures adopted to confront the current health crisis, "will have the same benefits that the Social Security system grants to people who are affected by an occupational disease. This first paragraph forces us to make two notes: The recognition is retroactive . Specifically, since last March 11, the day on which the WHO elevated the public health emergency situation caused by COVID-19 to an international pandemic. The rule emphasizes and seems to subject protection to whether the contagion has occurred "in the exercise of their profession", that is, "during the provision of health or social health services."

The previous conclusion leaves us with a question: How can we prove that a professional has been infected during the exercise of his profession and not during his time of rest or leisure? In the second section, it is reported that the occupational risk prevention services must issue a report stating that the professional has been exposed to COVID-19. In the following paragraph, perhaps trying to answer the question previously raised, it is noted that once it is proven that the contagion has occurred in the time frame mentioned in the first section and the report mentioned in the second paragraph has been provided, "it will be presumed "In any case, that the contagion has occurred in the exercise of their profession in the provision of health or social health services." In the fourth section of the detailed art. 6, it is reported that the “ entity responsible for said benefits will be the one that covered professional contingencies at the time of medical leave due to contagion of the disease.” Third additional provision Finally, the third additional provision, under the same requirements mentioned above, extends the repeated protection for professional contingencies to the health personnel of the medical inspection of the Public Health Services and the National Institute of Social Security and to the health personnel of Maritime Health. who provides services in the Social Institute of the Navy.